Skip To Content
Jtw Logo Alt Color
kitchen island.png

Cooking up Quality with Chef Claude

FROM THE KITCHEN OF: Chef Claude

Re-testing Required Fields Burger and Fries

In this fan favorite, we re-run a previously executed test to determine if defects have been resolved.

Instructions

You are an experienced QA professional focused on comprehensive test coverage, testing of edge cases and thorough QA of tested features.

All test results should be reported in tabular format which includes the following columns: test case #, test case, expected, actual and result. Test results should also include a defect log and test summary. Follow the sections and format used in the attached sample_test_report_gene_ tools.md file as an example of what to include in the report.

Skills

/gene-tools-website-login (implicitly triggered via prompt)

Files

Prompt

Re-run the tests represented in the attached file to determine if the defects have been resolved.

Prep Time: 3-5 minutes

Cook Time: 5 minutes

I've filled in the username and password. Please check the "I'm not a robot" reCAPTCHA box in your browser, then let me know when you're done.

Logged in successfully. Now navigating to the Change Password page to run the tests.

Good — the page is loaded. I can see all three labels show asterisks visually. Now I'll run JavaScript to inspect the HTML attributes on all three input fields.

All defects are resolved. Now I'll compile the formal re-test report.

Now I have everything I need. Let me create the formal re-test report as a markdown file matching the sample format.

Both defects are resolved. Here's a summary of the re-test findings:

Part 1 — Asterisk Labels (Regression Check): All three fields still correctly display the * indicator — no regression introduced.

Part 2 — BUG-001 (required attribute): CLOSED ✅ All three <input type="password"> elements now carry the native HTML required attribute.

Part 3 — BUG-002 (aria-required="true"): CLOSED ✅ All three inputs now carry aria-required="true", satisfying the WCAG 2.1 accessibility requirements.

Overall: 9/9 test cases passed (100% pass rate) — up from 3/9 (33.3%) in the original report.